Red Flags Checklist

20 signals that flag an Ethereum token as risky. Each row tells you the flag, the weight, the underlying on-chain signal our scoring engine emits, and a note on context. Print this page (Ctrl+P) and tape it next to your monitor - that's the highest-ROI safety upgrade you can make for free.

→ Run all 20 checks automatically

The scanner runs every signal in this table plus 60 more. Paste a contract, get the 0-100 risk score in 10 seconds.

How to use this list

Walk the list top to bottom on any token before buying. Any single Critical flag is enough to exit - those have near-100% empirical precision in our dataset. Two or more High flags usually compound to a scam pattern even when each one alone is ambiguous. Medium and Low flags are calibration noise - they matter only when stacked with weightier ones.

The "Signal" column is the exact flag name our scoring engine emits, in case you want to look it up in the signal catalogue for the full definition and the detection logic.

Contract

Red flag Weight Signal Why it matters
Contract source code not verified on Etherscan Medium unverified_bytecode_analyzed 30% of scams hide here; verified ≠ safe but unverified ≠ instant ditch either
Bytecode matches a known scam template (≥10 prior scam tokens) Critical known_scam_bytecode Our database tracks 156 such templates; reuse is the strongest single signal we ship
Suspicious function selectors in the bytecode Medium suspicious_selectors Selectors like `blacklist(address)`, `setBuyTax(uint256)`, `excludeFromMaxTx(address)` flagged from raw bytecode
Owner has not been renounced Low no_renounce_ownership Common in legitimate projects too; only matters when combined with other flags
Proxy contract detected (UUPS, beacon, or admin proxy) Medium proxy_detected Lets the deployer swap the implementation post-launch - kill switch hatch

Trading

Red flag Weight Signal Why it matters
Honeypot - sell simulation reverts on a clean buy Critical honeypot 100% precision in our 36 263-scam reference set - no false positives by construction
Sell tax above 30% Critical extreme_sell_fee Same as honeypot in effect; sellers receive almost nothing
Buy succeeds but sell fails for new accounts Critical sell_blocked Catches dynamic blacklists that activate after the first N buyers
Trading not enabled - sells revert for everyone but the deployer High trading_not_enabled Often pre-launch; if persistent after liquidity is added, treat as honeypot
Buy-only pattern - only one direction of trades is happening High buy_only_pattern Either honeypot or wash-trading by the deployer

Liquidity

Red flag Weight Signal Why it matters
Pool depth under $1k USD High low_liquidity Scaffolding launch; the deployer can pull it for 0.5 ETH
Deployer holds 100% of LP supply, unlocked High creator_holds_all_lp Rug-ready setup. Locked at Unicrypt or burned is the positive signal here
LP not burned and not locked Medium lp_not_burned Less critical than 100% deployer-held, but still a yellow flag

Deployer

Red flag Weight Signal Why it matters
Deployer wallet less than 24h old High new_wallet Combined with no prior history = textbook scam factory pattern
Deployer has launched 10+ tokens in the last 30 days Critical mass_deployer Serial scammer with assembly line; near-100% scam rate empirically
Deployer previously deployed ≥1 confirmed scam Critical previous_scam_tokens Past performance predicts future behavior in this niche
Deployer funded from a disposable wallet (< 7 days, single tx) Medium disposable_wallet Combined with funder graph: traces to mass scam clusters

Holders

Red flag Weight Signal Why it matters
Single non-LP wallet holds >50% of supply High single_mint_concentrated Either deployer-as-exit-liq or coordinated insider position
Fewer than 10 holders 24h after launch Medium very_few_holders Either organic-but-irrelevant or pre-rug positioning; need to read context

Brand

Red flag Weight Signal Why it matters
Token name or ticker mimics a known major brand High name_mimics_known_token Brand-jack pattern. 239 fake USDC, 49 fake PEPE, 43 fake TRUMP in our index

What this list does not catch

Time-delayed rugs. Some scams pass every static check at launch and pull liquidity weeks later. The protection there is real-time monitoring - set a price alert and watch the LP token balance.

Owner-triggered kill switches in upgradeable proxies. A contract that looks clean today can be malicious tomorrow if the implementation is swapped. Treat any proxy with admin powers as conditionally safe at best.

Off-chain trust failures. Custodial bridges, centralized treasuries, off-chain governance - none of these show up on Etherscan. Read the docs for that part.

Cross-references